How In-House Recruiters Differ From Corporate Recruiters

How Many Open Reqs Should In-House Recruiters Have?

The recruitment process can be tedious, time-consuming, and draining. Various aspects go into this process, from sourcing and screening potential employees to interviewing and hiring them. Fortunately, a recruiting company will help through this process. Various types of recruitment agencies suffice, and you need to understand what each of them brings to the table. The lowest is the differences between in-house and corporate recruiters.

Roles and Scope of Responsibilities

In-house and corporate recruiters are tasked with sourcing and hiring employees. However, corporate agencies serve multiple clients, meaning that they work with various industries. Sometimes, these agencies will focus on specific roles. For instance, they could be logistics headhunters agencies.

On the other hand, an in-house recruiter works for one company only, as they are firm employees. This professional will source and hire employees that match the company’s culture and vision. In most cases, you rely on in-house recruiters to get permanent employees. Further, they hire employees for various departments instead of dealing with multiple clients or industries.

Salary, Bonus, and Commission

Both in-house and agency recruiters expect a token for their services. However, while an in-house recruiter expects a salary, a recruiting agency gets a commission for its services. This in-house recruiter gets a base salary that is not pegged on their performance.

Conversely, an agency recruiter works on a commission. That means they must source and hire employees before they get the commission. At the same time, an agency recruiter could get a bonus for closing various deals with specific accounts.

Expectations, Qualities, and Skills

The recruiting company expects different results from these two. For instance, an employer requires an in-house recruiter to develop and improve procedures within the company, which is critical to brand image. Their role is administrative-driven, meaning that they must be team players and be ready to go through the entire recruitment process.

Contrarily, agency recruiters are often results-driven, meaning they hire people that can help grow the business. They multi-task, juggling between different employers and industries. Further, they must have excellent sales skills, promoting the company’s image. Yet, they do not participate in the entire recruitment process, as onboarding and training employees are not in their domain.

Culture Development

Every company looks forward to a splendid cultural development. Unfortunately, you can only get this from an in-house recruiter. This in-house recruiter will position your brand image to attract potential employees and new talents in the market. Further, they will keep a comprehensive database that allows them to reach past applicants and former employees.

On the other hand, a corporate agency will not focus so much on your firm’s culture. Instead, they concentrate on building their image, ensuring that they attract potential employers in the long run. However, they could grow personal relationships with employers and candidates, which allows them to get commissions.

In conclusion, both in-house and agency recruiters have specific roles to play. That means you could hire both of them simultaneously. Feel free to explore their roles and understand when to indulge each of them.